Digital texts Interactivity, reading experience and comprehensibility

Authors

  • Montesi Montesi Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Isabel Villaseñor Rodríguez Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v14.n1.2021.35339

Keywords:

Interactivity, Text comprehension, Information behavior, Reading experience, User studies

Abstract

We present the results of a research whose aim is to evaluate the level of comprehensibility of online texts through a survey on the reading experience. The comprehensibility of the information represents a new aspect of information behavior, conditioned by subjective components and characteristics of the reading experience of those who read. We study the effect of the interactivity of the digital text by comparing the reading experience of two texts, both on the subject of physical exercise and differentiated by the level of interactivity, being higher in one case. Thirty-nine people participated in the survey and data were collected on the reading experience, the understanding of the text and its influence on attitudes and opinions, as well as on the global assessment of the two pages. Comprehension of the text was measured based on 14 true and false questions. The data obtained were analyzed through descriptive statistics and, where appropriate, inferential statistics tests were carried out. The only significant difference that was found between the two pages concerns a better comprehensibility of the more interactive page, although the comprehensibility is not related to a greater use of the interactive functionalities in the two pages. Finally, the results show that the consumption of digital text is conditioned by the expectations that readers bring to it and that interactivity is not only a property of the medium but also co-constructed in the interaction between the medium and the readers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Montesi Montesi , Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Facultad de Ciencias de la Documentación, Madrid, España

Isabel Villaseñor Rodríguez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Facultad de Ciencias de la Documentación, Madrid, España

References

BUCY, E. P.; TAO, C. C. The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, v. 9, n. 3, p. 647-672, 2007.

COLLINS-THOMPSON, K. Computational assessment of text readability: A survey of current and future research. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 165, n. 2, p. 97-135, 2014.

FREUND, L; DODSON, S.; KOPAK, R. On Measuring Learning in Search: A Position Paper. En: Search as Learning (SAL), Pisa, Italy, July 21, 2016.

GHOSH, S.; RATH, M.; SHAH, C. Searching as learning: Exploring search behavior and learning outcomes in learning-related tasks. En: CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION & RETRIEVAL, CHIIR 18, March 22”“31, 2018. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176386

HOPPE, A.; HOLTZ, P.; KAMMERER, Y.; YU, R.; DIETZE, S.; EWERTH, R. Current challenges for studying search as learning processes. En: Proceedings of Learning and Education with Web Data, Amsterdam, Netherlands, May 1-4, 2018 (LILE2018).

LIU, H.; LIU, C.; BELKIN, N. J. Investigation of users' knowledge change process in learning”related search tasks. En: Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 56, n. 1, p. 166-175, 2019.

OH, J.; SUNDAR, S. S. How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, v. 65, n. 2, p. 213-236, 2015.

OH, J.; SUNDAR, S. S. What Happens When You Click and Drag: Unpacking the Relationship between On-Screen Interaction and User Engagement with an Anti-Smoking Website. Health Communication, v. 35, n. 3, p. 269-280, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1560578

SOHN, D.; CHOI, S. M. Measuring expected interactivity: Scale development and validation. New media & society, v. 16, n. 5, p. 856-870, 2014.

SUN, Y.; ZHANG, Y.; GWIZDKA, J.; TRACE, C. B. Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: Systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators. Journal of medical Internet research, v. 21, n. 5, e12522, 2019.

SUNDAR, S. S. Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. En: Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford University Press, 2012.

YANG, F.; SHEN, F. Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, v. 45, n. 5, p. 635-658, 2018.

YANG, F.; Shen, F. Involvement without knowledge gain: A meta-analysis of the cognitive effects of website interactivity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, v. 63, n. 2, p. 211-230, 2019.

XU, Q.; SUNDAR, S. S. Interactivity and memory: information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 63, p. 620-629, 2016.

Published

2021-01-16

How to Cite

Montesi , M. ., & Villaseñor Rodríguez, I. . (2021). Digital texts Interactivity, reading experience and comprehensibility. Revista Ibero-Americana De Ciência Da Informação, 14(1), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v14.n1.2021.35339

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.