The great conflict: paradigm change in modern medical patient relations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rbb.v16.2020.31759

Keywords:

Autonomy. Medical ethics. Justice. Doctor-patient relationship.

Abstract

Over a long period of medical history, the ideal ethical interaction between the physician and the patient was based on guaranteeing the first full autonomy over the given treatment, however, without taking into account the patient's own perception of the decisions that fell upon his body, health and life. This ethical interaction, described by many as paternalistic, is no longer a reality, given the noticeable paradigm shift in the doctor-patient relationship experienced in recent years. In this sense, the present article aims to analyze the general panorama of the historical development of medical ethics and its action situation in Brazil to, in the end, verify the current paradigm change in the doctor-patient relationship. Justified by the numerous medical conflicts in the legal sphere, the brief research seeks to meet the concerns that affect both the medical and the legal world. In the end, it will be verified that changes that occurred, for example, during anamnesis and in therapy, contributed for that the unilateral decision became shared; and the doctor-patient relationship, until then authoritarian and paternalistic, became a contractualist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angotti Neto H. A tradição da medicina. Brasília: Academia Monergista, 2016.

Angotti Neto H. Arte médica: de Hipócrates a Cristo. Brasília: Academia Monergista, 2018.

Bergstein, G. A informação na relação médico-paciente. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.

Brasil. Lei nº 8.078, de 11/09/1990. Acessível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8078.htm.

Brasil. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução CFM n° 2.217 de 27/09/2018. Acessível em em: https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/resolucoes/BR/2018/2217.

França GV. Direito médico. 11ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2013.

França GV. Direito Médico. 15ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2019.

Nascimento Júnior PG; Guimarães, TMM. A relação médico-paciente e seus aspectos psicodinâmicos - Revista Eletrônica de Bioética de Brasília 2003, 2(1). Acessível em: http://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/152.

Facchini Neto E; Gemelli Eick, L. Responsabilidade civil do médico pela falha no dever de informação, à luz do princípio da boa-fé objetiva - Revista da Ajuris de Porto Alegre 2018, 45(145).

Flemming HJ. A medicina pós-hipocrática: o problema e a solução. Brasília, DF: Editora Monergismo, 2017.

Grisard N; Ramos Filho I. Manual de orientação ética e disciplinar. Florianópolis: CREMESC, 2006.

Kfouri Neto M. Responsabilidade civil do médico. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2019.

Monte, FQ. Ética médica: evolução histórica e conceitos - Revista Eletrônica de Bioética de Brasília 2009, (17)3. Acessível em: http://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/507.

Platão. A República. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2007.

Published

2021-06-24

How to Cite

de Aguiar Bonissoni, N. L. ., & Piazza Noldin, P. H. (2021). The great conflict: paradigm change in modern medical patient relations. Revista Brasileira De Bioética, 16, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26512/rbb.v16.2020.31759

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais