Prejudice and Egalitarian Norms:

Analysis Based on Moral Judgment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39516.pt

Keywords:

Prejudice, Social Norms, Moral Judgment, Adoption

Abstract

Based on the social psychology of development, this study investigated whether differences in moral reasoning would imply differences in prejudice, conforming with an egalitarian norm and in the use of moral justifications
for the suppression of prejudice. A total of 555 Brazilians participated in this study, the final sample being composed of 500 Brazilians, who answered an online questionnaire with measurements used to assess the variables of interest in the research. Based on descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, the results indicated a relationship between differences in moral judgment and differences in the level of prejudice, in accordance with the egalitarian norm and the use of moral justifications. The results are discussed from the perspective of social psychology and moral development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luciana Maria Maia, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil

Professora Titular (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia)  

Júlio Rique, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil

Professor Associado (Psicologia), desde 16/01/2006.

References

Allport, G. W. (1971). La naturaleza del prejuicio [The nature of prejudice] (4th. Ed.). EUDEBA Editorial Universitária de Buenos Aires.

Beauvois, J.-L. (2002). Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism. In N. Dubois (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 123-147). Routledge.

Bostyn, D. H., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2016). Right-wing attitudes and moral cognition: Are right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation related to utilitarian judgment? Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.006

Camino, C. P. S., & Luna, V. (1989). Reformulação e adaptação do Defining Issues Test (DIT) [Reformulation and adaptation of the Defining Issues Test]. Anais do XXII Congresso Interamericano de Psicologia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Camino, C. P. S., Rique, J., Ribeiro, J., & Araújo, R. M. (1996). A afetividade e o julgamento moral [Affection and moral jugment]. VI Simpósio de Pesquisa e Intercâmbio Científico da ANPEPP, Teresópolis, RJ.

Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological science, 24(2), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447820

Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., & Kauffman, K. (1987). Theoretical introduction to the measurement of moral judgment. In A. Colby, L. Kohlberg, B. Speicher, A. Hewer, D. Candee, J. Gibbs, & C. Power (Eds.), The measurement of moral judgment: Theoretical foundations and research validation (pp. 1-61). Cambridge University Press.

Conselho Federal de Psicologia. Resolução nº 001 (1999, 22 de março). Estabelece normas de atuação para os psicólogos em relação à questão da Orientação Sexual [Stablishes norms of conduct to psychologists regarding sexual orientation] CFP.

Costarelli, S., & Gerłowska, J. (2015). I am not prejudiced towards “them”. . . I am ambivalent! The moderating roles of attitudinal basis and motivation to respond without prejudice. Group Dynamics, 5(3), 279-291. http://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000017

Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2004). The justification-suppression model of prejudice: An approach to the history of prejudice research. In C. S. Crandall, & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 237-267). Lewinian Press.

Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359-378. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359

Dubois, N. (2003). The concept of norm. Em N. Dubous (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 1-16). Routledge.

Endicott, L., Bock, T., & Narvaez, D. (2003). Moral reasoning, intercultural development, and multicultural experiences: Relations and cognitive underpinnings. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00030-0

Falcão, L. C. (2004). Adoção de crianças por homossexuais: Crenças e formas de preconceito [Child adoption by homosexuals: Beliefs and forms of prejudice, Master’s Thesis in Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás]. Sistema de Publicação Eletrônica de Teses e Dissertações. http://tede2.pucgoias.edu.br:8080/handle/tede/1931

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. http://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

França, D. X., & Monteiro, M. B. (2013). Social norms and the expression of prejudice: The development of aversive racism in childhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 263-271. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1965

Freires, L. A. (2015). Atitudes frente à homoparentalidade: Uma explicação a partir de variáveis explícitas e implícitas [Attitudes in homoparenting: An explanation with explicit and implicit variables, PhD Dissertation in Psychology, Universidade Federal da Paraíba]. Sistema de Publicação Eletrônica de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB. http://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br/handle/tede/7521

Gato, J., & Fontaine, A. M. (2014). Homoparentalidade no masculino: Uma revisão da literatura [Gay fathers and their children: A literature review]. Psicologia & Sociedade, 26(2), 312-322. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822014000200008

Gielen, U. (1994). Kohlberg’s moral development theory. In L. Kuhmerker, U. Gielen, & R. Hayes (Eds.), The Kohlberg legacy for the helping professions (pp. 18-38). Doxa Books.

Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development Harper & Row.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages Harper & Row.

Leidner, B., Kardos, P., & Castano, E. (2018). The effects of moral and pragmatic arguments against torture on demands for judicial reform. Political Psychology, 39(1), 143-162. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12386

Lima, M. E. O. (2020). Psicologia social do preconceito e do racismo [Social Psychology of prejudice and racism] Blucher.

Lima, M. E. O., Machado, C., Ávila, J., Lima, C., & Vala, J. (2006). Normas sociais e preconceito: O impacto da igualdade e da competição no preconceito automático contra os negros [Social norms and prejudice: The impact of egalitarianism and competition on the automatic prejudice against blacks]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 19(2), 309-319. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722006000200018

Lima, M. E. O., & Vala, J. (2004). As novas formas de expressão do preconceito e do racismo [The new forms of expression of prejudice and racism]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 9, 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2004000300002

McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31(3), 453-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x

Moreira, P. L., & Rique, J. (2019). Julgamento moral e posicionamento político-ideológico de jovens brasileiros [Moral judgment and political ideological position]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 71(1), 54-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.36482/1809-5267.ARBP2019v71i1p.54-67

Moreira, P. L., Rique Neto, J., Sabucedo, J. M., & Camino, C. P. D. S. (2018). Moral judgment, political ideology, and collective action. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 610-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12479

Narvaez, D., Getz, I., Rest, J. R., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Individual moral judgment and cultural ideologies. Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.478

Oyamot, C. M., Jackson, M. S., Fisher, E. L., Deason, G., & Borgida, E. (2017). Social norms and egalitarian values mitigate authoritarian intolerance toward sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 38(5), 777-794. http://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12360

Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public Lexington Books.

Passini, S., & Morselli, D. (2016). Blatant domination and subtle exclusion: The mediation of moral inclusion on the relationship between social dominance orientation and prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.022

Passini, S., & Villano, P. (2013). Judging moral issues in a multicultural society. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72(4), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000116

Pereira, A., Monteiro, M. B., & Camino, L. (2009). Social norms and prejudice against homosexuals. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 576-584. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001943

Pereira, C., & Vala, J. (2010). Do preconceito à discriminação justificada [From prejudice to justified discrimination]. Inquisitive Mind Português, 1(2-3), 1-13. https://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/8934/1/ICs_CRPereira_JVala_Preconceito_ARN.pdf

Pereira, C. R., & Vala, J. (2011). A legitimação da discriminação em diferentes contextos normativos [Legitimizing discrimination in different normative contexts]. In E. M. Techio, & M. E. O. Lima (Eds.), Cultura e produção das diferenças: Estereótipos e preconceito no Brasil, na Espanha e Portugal (pp. 363-406). TechnoPolitik Editora.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106

Piaget, J. (1932). O juízo moral na criança [The moral judgment of the child] (4th. Ed.). Summus.

Piaget, J. (1964). Seis estudos de psicologia [Six psychological studies] (24th. Ed.). Forense Universitária.

Piaget, J. (1965). Sociological studies Routledge.

Projeto de Lei do Senado n. 612. (2011). Altera os Arts. 1.723 e 1.726 do Código Civil, para permitir o reconhecimento legal da união estável entre pessoas do mesmo sexo [Changes articles 1,723 and 1,726 of the Civil Code, to allow the legal recognition of the stable union between same sex people]. https://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/102589

Resolução n. 175 de 14 de maio de 2013 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. (2013). Dispõe sobre a habilitação, celebração de casamento civil, ou de conversão de união estável em casamento, entre pessoas de mesmo sexo [Defines the ability, celebration of civil marriage, or conversion of stable union in marriage, between same sex people] Diário de Justiça, em 15 de maio de 2012, Edição n. 89/2013. http://www.cnj.jus.br/atos-administrativos/atos-da-presidencia/resolucoespresidencia/24675-resolucaon175-de-14-de-maio-de-2013

Rest, J., Cooper, D., Coder, R., Masanz, J., & Anderson, D. (1974). Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas: An objective measure of development. Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 478-488. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.478

Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.5

Rique, J., & Camino, C. (1997). Consistency and inconsistency in adolescents’ moral reasoning. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(4), 813-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597384686

Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12012

Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369468

Santos, J. V. O., Araújo, L. F., Negreiros, F., & Cerqueira-Santos, E. (2018). Adoção de crianças por casais homossexuais: As representações sociais [Adoption of children by homosexual couples: The social representations]. Temas em Psicologia, 26(1), 139-152. http://doi.org/10.9788/TP2018.1-06Pt

Scruton, R. (2016). Como ser um conservador [How to be a conservative] (5th. Ed.). Record.

Senado Federal. (2018). Lei n. 8.069/90: Estatuto da criança e do adolescente [Law n. 8,096/90: Statute of the children and adolescent] Senado. https://www2.senado.leg.br/bdsf/bitstream/handle/id/544281/estatuto_da_crianca_e_do_adolescente_2ed.pdf

Sherif, M. (1936). The Psychology of social norms Harper & Brothers.

Silva, J. A., Sousa, A. M. B. D., & Fernandes-Eloi, J. (2017). Homoparentalidade no contexto da adoção e das práticas parentais: Uma revisão sistemática [Homoparenthood in the context of adoption and parental practices: A systematic review]. Pensando Famílias, 21(2), 60-75. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/penf/v21n2/v21n2a06.pdf

Testé, B. (2002). Conformity and deviance. In N. Dubois (Ed.), A social cognitive approach to social norms (pp.17-37). Taylor and Francis.

Published

2023-08-11

How to Cite

de Lucena Moreira, P., Maia, L. M., Rique, J., & Pereira dos Santos Camino, C. (2023). Prejudice and Egalitarian Norms:: Analysis Based on Moral Judgment. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39516.pt

Issue

Section

Estudos Empíricos